DÙNG ÁN LIÊN HIỆP QUỐC ĐỂ CỨU VIỆT NAM
LIÊN HIỆP QUỐC
ĐỂ CỨU VIỆT NAM
THOÁT NẠN TẦU CỘNG XÂM LƯỢC
United Nations Security Council : Hội Đồng Bảo An Liên Hiệp QuốcFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Leaders of the five permanent member states at a summit in 2000. Clockwise from front left Chinese President Jiang Zemin, U.S. President Bill Clinton, British Prime Minister Tony Blair, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and French President Jacques Chirac.
See also: China and the United Nations, France and the United Nations, Russia and the United Nations, Soviet Union and the United Nations, United Kingdom and the United Nations, and United States and the United Nations
The Security Council’s five permanent members have the power to veto any substantive resolution:
The five permanent members (also known as the P5 or Big 5) were drawn from the victorious powers of World War II, and at the UN’s founding in 1946, the Security Council consisted of France, the Republic of China, the United Kingdom, the United States, and theUSSR. There have been two seat changes since then, although not reflected in Article 23 of theCharter of the United Nations as it has not been accordingly amended:
- [1]China’s seat was originally filled by the Republic of China, but due to the stalemate of theChinese Civil War in 1949, there have been two states claiming to represent China since then, and both officially claim each other’s territory. In 1971, the People’s Republic of China was awarded China’s seat in the United Nations by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758, and the Republic of China (based in Taiwan) soon lost membership in all UN organizations.
- [2]Russia, being the legal successor state to the Soviet Union after the latter’s collapse in1991, acquired the originally-Soviet seat, including the Soviet Union’s former representation in the Security Council.
THOÁT NẠN TẦU CỘNG XÂM LƯỢC
Cùng dùng phương thức hợp pháp này, qúy vị yêu nước Việt Nam ủng hộ Chính Phủ Quốc Gia Việt Nam Lâm Thời (CPQGVNLT) tại Liên Hiệp Quốc đòi hỏi sự công bằng trong Hiến Chương LHQ để thay Cờ Vàng Chính Nghĩa Quốc Giavào chỗ cờ đỏ Việt Cộng tay sai Tầu Cộng một cách khôn ngoan, không đổ máu, mà dân Việt được có Dân Chủ và giầu mạnh. Quý vị đoàn kết với CPQGVNLT thì đại công cứu nước là của quý vị.
[2] (Cộng Sản Liên Bang Xô Viết bị đánh “Xẹp Hết Cứu Nổi” phải nhường nước cho dân Nga ngày 25/12/1991)
The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) was formally dissolved on December 25, 1991. This left all fifteen republics of the Soviet Union as independent sovereign states. The dissolution of the world’s first and largest Communist state also marked an end to the Cold War.
Cũng dùng phương thức hợp pháp này, khi DNA chứng minh được Hồ Chí Minh là người Tầu, giả mạo người Việt Nam tên Nguyễn Ái Quốc đểlập đảng CSVN làm tay sai Tầu Cộng và lãnh đạo cái gọi là “CP/CHXHCN/VN”thì “Chính Phủ” Việt Cộng do Tầu ngụy tạo, không do dân Việt bầu lên này sẽ mất chính danh, không đủ tư cách đại diện cho nước Việt Nam tại Liên Hiệp Quốc. Lúc đó Chính Phủ Quốc Gia Việt Nam Lâm Thời (CPQGVNLT) do ba thế hệ Việt Nam khai sinh, sẽ tạm thay thế cho đến khi có 1 Chính Phủ Quốc Gia Hợp Pháp do dân Việt bầu lên. Chính Phủ đó sẽ chính thức đại diện cho Việt Nam. Cờ vàng chính nghĩa sẽ thay thế cờ máu sao vàng. Việt Cộng phải rút đi cho khỏi đổ máu, nhưng được CPQGVNLT khoan hồng cho Việt Cộng giữ tính mạng, danh dự và tài sản hợp pháp. Người Việt yêu nước nghĩ sao?
REMARK:
1/ The Republic of China was formally established on 1 January 1912 following the revolution of Wuchang Uprising on 10 October 1911. From its founding and until 1949 it encompassed mainland China (including Tibetand Outer Mongolia). Central authority waxed and waned in response to warlordism (1915–28), Japanese invasion (1937–45), and theChinese Civil War (1927–49), with central authority strongest during the Nanjing Decade(1927–37) when most of China came under the control of the Kuomintang (KMT). At the end ofWorld War II in 1945, with the surrender of Japan, the Republic of China took over the island groups of Taiwan and Penghu from the Japanese Empire.
The Communist takeover of continental China in the Chinese Civil War in 1949 and later Hainan,Tachen and other outlying islands in the 1950s left the ruling Kuomintang (KMT) with control over only Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen, Matsu, and other minor islands. The KMT declared Taipei theprovisional capital.[14] On the other hand, the Communist Party of China took over all of mainland China[15][16] and founded the People’s Republic of China in Beijing, leading to two rival governments claiming to be the sole legitimate government of China. However, until the 1970s the ROC was still recognized by many countries and the United Nations as the sole legitimate government of both mainland China and Taiwan. The ROC had been a founding member of theUnited Nations[17] and one of the five permanent members of the Security Council until 1971, when China’s representative was replaced by the PRC via UN General Assembly Resolution 2758.
2/ The Russian Provisional Government(Russian: Временное правительство России, Vremennoye pravitel’stvo Rossii) was the short-lived administrative body which sought to govern Russia immediately following the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II in March 1917 (Nicholas‘ manifest of abdication).[2][3]On September 14, the State Duma of the Russian Empire was officially dissolved by the newly created Directorate, and the country was declared the Russian Republic (Russian:Российская республика, Rossiyskaya respublika). It is also sometimes known as the „Kerensky Government“ after its most prominent leader. It lasted approximately eight months, and ceased to exist after power in Russia was transferred to the Soviets by the Bolsheviksin October 1917.
When the authority of the Tsar’s government began disintegrating after the February Revolution of 1917, two rival institutions, the Duma and the Petrograd Soviet, competed for power. Tsar Nicholas II abdicated on March 2 (Julian calendar) and nominated his brother, Grand Duke Michaelas the next tsar. Grand Duke Michael did not want to take the poisoned chalice[7] and deferred acceptance of imperial power the next day. Legal authorization for the transfer of power was given by a proclamation signed by Grand Duke Michael. The Provisional Government was expected to rule until the Constituent Assembly later determined the form of government in Russia. The Provisional Government was designed to set up elections to the Assembly while maintaining essential government services, but its power was effectively limited by the Petrograd Soviet’s growing authority.
The Soviet Union was founded in December 1922 when the Russian SFSR, which formed during the Russian Revolution of 1917 and emerged victorious in the ensuing Russian Civil War, unified with the Transcaucasian, Ukrainian and Belorussian SSRs. After the death of Vladimir Lenin, the first Soviet leader, power was eventually consolidated by Joseph Stalin,[4] who led the country through a large-scale industrialization with command economy and political repression.[4][5]During World War II, in June 1941, the Soviet Union was attacked by Germany, a country it had signed a non-aggression pact with. After four years of warfare, the Soviet Union emerged as one of the world’s two superpowers, extending its influence into much of Eastern Europe and beyond.
The Soviet Union and its satellites from the Eastern Bloc were one of two participating factions in the Cold War, a global ideological and political struggle against the United States and its allies; the Soviet bloc ultimately lost, however, having been hit by economic standstill and both domestic and foreign political unrest, an event which marks the beginning of the post-war period.[6][7] In the late 1980s the last Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev tried to reform the state with his policies ofperestroika and glasnost, but the Soviet Union collapsed and was formally dissolved in December 1991 after the abortive August coup attempt.[8] Since then the Russian Federation has been exercising its rights and fulfilling its obligations.[9]
3/ Những nhà Ái Quốc,
Nhân Sĩ Việt Nam có muốn kết hợp với CHÍNH PHỦ QUỐC GIA VIỆT
NAM LÂM THỜI để giải thể tà quyền Cộng Sản Việt Nam trong
ôn hòa bằng cách dùng SỰ THẬT, với thế CHÍNH NGHĨA QUỐC GIA,
và lý luận khôn ngoan, tạo thành công tại Liên Hiệp Quốc hay
không? Cách này còn dể hơn Yetsin giải thể toàn bộ Cộng Sản
Liên Sô ngày 19 tháng 8 năm 1991.
YỆN ĐOÀN
IMPORTANCE OF PREVENTING CONFLICT THROUGH DEVELOPMENT, DEMOCRACY STRESSED, AS SECURITY COUNCIL UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTS RESOLUTION 1674 (2006)
5430th Meeting (AM)
IMPORTANCE OF PREVENTING CONFLICT THROUGH DEVELOPMENT, DEMOCRACY STRESSED,
AS SECURITY COUNCIL UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTS RESOLUTION 1674 (2006)
Wide-Ranging Text on Civilians in Armed Conflict Strongly
Condemns Targeting of Civilians, Sexual Violence, Abuse by Peacekeepers
The Security Council emphasized this morning
the importance of preventing armed conflict and its recurrence, and
stressed the need for a comprehensive approach through the promotion of
economic growth, poverty eradication, sustainable development, national
reconciliation, good governance, democracy, the rule of law, as well as
respect for, and protection of, human rights.
As it unanimously adopted resolution 1674
(2006), the Council condemned in the strongest terms all sexual and
other forms of violence committed against civilians in armed conflict,
particularly women and children, and undertook to ensure that all peace
support operations employed all feasible measures to prevent such
violence and to address its impact where it took place.
The Council condemned in equally strong terms
all acts of sexual exploitation, abuse and trafficking of women and
children by military, police and civilian personnel involved in United
Nations operations, and welcomed efforts by United Nations agencies and
peacekeeping operations to implement a zero-tolerance policy in that
regard. It requested the Secretary-General and personnel-contributing
countries to continue to take all appropriate action necessary to combat
abuses, including through the full and immediate implementation of
measures adopted in the relevant General Assembly resolutions based upon
the recommendations of the report of the Special Committee on
Peacekeeping (document A/59/19/Rev.1).
Condemning also deliberate attacks against
United Nations and associated personnel involved in humanitarian
missions, as well as other humanitarian personnel, the Council urged
States on whose territory such attacks occurred to prosecute or
extradite those responsible. It welcomed, in that regard, the General
Assembly’s adoption, on 8 December 2005, of the Optional Protocol to
the Convention on the Safety of United Nations and Associated Personnel.
By other terms of the text, the Council
reaffirmed its strongest condemnation of all acts of violence or abuses
committed against civilians in situations of armed conflict in violation
of applicable international obligations with respect, in particular, to
(i) torture and other prohibited treatment, (ii) gender-based and
sexual violence, (iii) violence against children, (iv) the recruitment
and use of child soldiers, (v) trafficking in humans, (vi) forced
displacement, and (vii) the intentional denial of humanitarian
assistance. It demanded that all parties end such practices.
Recalling that the deliberate targeting of
civilians and other protected persons in situations of armed conflict
was a flagrant violation of international humanitarian law, the Council
stressed the importance for all, within the framework of humanitarian
assistance, of upholding and respecting the humanitarian principles of
humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence. It urged all those
concerned to allow full unimpeded access by humanitarian personnel to
civilians in need of assistance in situations of armed conflict, and to
make available, as far as possible, all necessary facilities for their
operations.
The Council underscored the importance of
disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of ex-combatants in the
protection of conflict-affected civilians. The Council emphasized (i)
its support for the inclusion in United Nations peacekeeping and other
mandates of specific and effective measures for disarmament,
demobilization and reintegration, (ii) the importance of incorporating
such activities into specific peace agreements, where appropriate and in
consultation with the parties, and (iii) the importance of making
available adequate resources for their full completion.
Recalling that the forcible displacement of
civilians in situations of armed conflict in violation of parties’
obligations under international humanitarian law were prohibited, the
Council urged the international community to support and assist States
to fulfil their responsibilities regarding the protection of refugees
and other persons protected under international humanitarian law. It
reaffirmed the need to maintain the security and civilian character of
refugee and internally displaced person camps, and stressed the primary
responsibility of States in that regard.
In a related provision, the Council called upon
all parties concerned to ensure that all peace processes, peace
agreements and post-conflict recovery and reconstruction planning had
regard for the special needs of women and children and included specific
measures for the protection of civilians, including (i) the cessation
of attacks on civilians, (ii) the facilitation of the provision of
humanitarian assistance, (iii) the creation of conditions conducive to
the voluntary, safe, dignified and sustainable return of refugees and
internally displaced persons, (iv) the facilitation of early access to
education and training, (v) the re-establishment of the rule of law, and
(vi) the ending of impunity.
The meeting began at 10:10 a.m. and ended at 10:15 a.m.
Council Resolution
The full text of resolution 1674 (2006) reads, as follows:
“The Security Council,
“Reaffirming its resolutions 1265 (1999)
and 1296 (2000) on the protection of civilians in armed conflict, its
various resolutions on children and armed conflict and on women, peace
and security, as well as its resolution 1631 (2005) on cooperation
between the United Nations and regional organizations in maintaining
international peace and security, and further reaffirming its determination to ensure respect for, and follow-up to, these resolutions,
“Reaffirming its commitment to the
Purposes of the Charter of the United Nations as set out in Article 1
(1-4) of the Charter, and to the Principles of the Charter as set out in
Article 2 (1-7) of the Charter, including its commitment to the
principles of the political independence, sovereign equality and
territorial integrity of all States, and respect for the sovereignty of
all States,
“Acknowledging that peace and security,
development and human rights are the pillars of the United Nations
system and the foundations for collective security and well being, and recognizing in this regard that development, peace and security and human rights are interlinked and mutually reinforcing,
“Expressing its deep regret that civilians account for the vast majority of casualties in situations of armed conflict,
“Gravely concerned with the effects of
the illicit exploitation and trafficking of natural resources, as well
as the illicit trafficking of small arms and light weapons, and the use
of such weapons on civilians affected by armed conflict,
“Recognizing the important contribution to the protection of civilians in armed conflict by regional organizations, and acknowledging in this regard, the steps taken by the African Union,
“Recognizing the important role that
education can play in supporting efforts to halt and prevent abuses
committed against civilians affected by armed conflict, in particular
efforts to prevent sexual exploitation, trafficking in humans, and
violations of applicable international law regarding the recruitment and
re-recruitment of child soldiers,
“Recalling the particular impact which
armed conflict has on women and children, including as refugees and
internally displaced persons, as well as on other civilians who may have
specific vulnerabilities, and stressing the protection and assistance needs of all affected civilian populations,
“Reaffirming that parties to armed
conflict bear the primary responsibility to take all feasible steps to
ensure the protection of affected civilians,
“Bearing in mind its primary
responsibility under the Charter of the United Nations for the
maintenance of international peace and security, and underlining the importance of taking measures aimed at conflict prevention and resolution,
“1. Notes with appreciation the
contribution of the Report of the Secretary-General of 28 November
2005 to its understanding of the issues surrounding the protection of
civilians in armed conflict, and takes note of its conclusions;
“2. Emphasises the importance of preventing armed conflict and its recurrence, and stresses in this context
the need for a comprehensive approach through promoting economic
growth, poverty eradication, sustainable development, national
reconciliation, good governance, democracy, the rule of law, and respect
for, and protection of, human rights, and in this regard, urges the cooperation of Member States and underlines
the importance of a coherent, comprehensive and coordinated approach by
the principal organs of the United Nations, cooperating with one
another and within their respective mandates;
“3. Recalls that deliberately
targeting civilians and other protected persons as such in situations of
armed conflict is a flagrant violation of international humanitarian
law, reiterates its condemnation in the strongest terms of such practices, and demands that all parties immediately put an end to such practices;
“4. Reaffirms the provisions of
paragraphs 138 and 139 of the 2005 World Summit Outcome Document
regarding the responsibility to protect populations from genocide, war
crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity;
“5. Reaffirms also its condemnation in
the strongest terms of all acts of violence or abuses committed against
civilians in situations of armed conflict in violation of applicable
international obligations with respect in particular to (i) torture and
other prohibited treatment, (ii) gender-based and sexual violence, (iii)
violence against children, (iv) the recruitment and use of child
soldiers, (v) trafficking in humans, (vi) forced displacement, and (vii)
the intentional denial of humanitarian assistance, and demands that all parties put an end to such practices;
“6. Demands that all parties concerned
comply strictly with the obligations applicable to them under
international law, in particular those contained in the Hague
Conventions of 1899 and 1907 and in the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and
their Additional Protocols of 1977, as well as with the decisions of the
Security Council;
“7. Reaffirms that ending impunity is
essential if a society in conflict or recovering from conflict is to
come to terms with past abuses committed against civilians affected by
armed conflict and to prevent future such abuses, draws attention
to the full range of justice and reconciliation mechanisms to be
considered, including national, international and “mixed” criminal
courts and tribunals and truth and reconciliation commissions, and notes
that such mechanisms can promote not only individual responsibility for
serious crimes, but also peace, truth, reconciliation and the rights of
the victims;
“8. Emphasizes in this context the
responsibility of States to comply with their relevant obligations to
end impunity and to prosecute those responsible for war crimes,
genocide, crimes against humanity and serious violations of
international humanitarian law, while recognizing, for States in or
recovering from armed conflict, the need to restore or build independent
national judicial systems and institutions;
“9. Calls on States that have not
already done so to consider ratifying the instruments of international
humanitarian, human rights and refugee law, and to take appropriate
legislative, judicial and administrative measures to implement their
obligations under these instruments;
“10. Demands that all States fully
implement all relevant decisions of the Security Council, and in this
regard cooperate fully with United Nations peacekeeping missions and
country teams in the follow-up and implementation of these resolutions;
“11. Calls upon all parties concerned
to ensure that all peace processes, peace agreements and post-conflict
recovery and reconstruction planning have regard for the special needs
of women and children and include specific measures for the protection
of civilians including (i) the cessation of attacks on civilians, (ii)
the facilitation of the provision of humanitarian assistance, (iii) the
creation of conditions conducive to the voluntary, safe, dignified and
sustainable return of refugees and internally displaced persons, (iv)
the facilitation of early access to education and training, (v) the
re-establishment of the rule of law, and (vi) the ending of impunity;
“12. Recalls the prohibition of the
forcible displacement of civilians in situations of armed conflict under
circumstances that are in violation of parties’ obligations under
international humanitarian law;
“13. Urges the international community
to provide support and assistance to enable States to fulfil their
responsibilities regarding the protection of refugees and other persons
protected under international humanitarian law;
“14. Reaffirms the need to maintain the security and civilian character of refugee and internally displaced person camps, stresses the primary responsibility of States in this regard, and encourages
the Secretary-General where necessary and in the context of existing
peacekeeping operations and their respective mandates, to take all
feasible measures to ensure security in and around such camps and of
their inhabitants;
“15. Expresses its intention of continuing its collaboration with the United Nations Emergency Relief Coordinator, and invites
the Secretary-General to fully associate him from the earliest stages
of the planning of United Nations peacekeeping and other relevant
missions;
“16. Reaffirms its practice of ensuring
that the mandates of United Nations peacekeeping, political and
peacebuilding missions include, where appropriate and on a case-by-case
basis, provisions regarding (i) the protection of civilians,
particularly those under imminent threat of physical danger within their
zones of operation, (ii) the facilitation of the provision of
humanitarian assistance, and (iii) the creation of conditions conducive
to the voluntary, safe, dignified and sustainable return of refugees and
internally displaced persons, and expresses its intention of
ensuring that (i) such mandates include clear guidelines as to what
missions can and should do to achieve those goals, (ii) the protection
of civilians is given priority in decisions about the use of available
capacity and resources, including information and intelligence
resources, in the implementation of the mandates, and (iii) that
protection mandates are implemented;
“17. Reaffirms that, where appropriate,
United Nations peacekeeping and other relevant missions should provide
for the dissemination of information about international humanitarian,
human rights and refugee law and the application of relevant Security
Council resolutions;
“18. Underscores the importance of
disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of ex-combatants (DDR) in
the protection of civilians affected by armed conflict, and, in this
regard, emphasizes (i) its support for the inclusion in mandates
of United Nations peacekeeping and other relevant missions, where
appropriate and on a case-by-case basis, of specific and effective
measures for DDR, (ii) the importance of incorporating such activities
into specific peace agreements, where appropriate and in consultation
with the parties, and (iii) the importance of adequate resources being
made available for the full completion of DDR programmes and activities;
“19. Condemns in the strongest terms all sexual and other forms of violence committed against civilians in armed conflict, in particular women and children, and undertakes
to ensure that all peace support operations employ all feasible
measures to prevent such violence and to address its impact where it
takes place;
“20. Condemns in equally strong terms
all acts of sexual exploitation, abuse and trafficking of women and
children by military, police and civilian personnel involved in United
Nations operations, welcomes the efforts undertaken by United
Nations agencies and peacekeeping operations to implement a
zero-tolerance policy in this regard, and requests the
Secretary-General and personnel-contributing countries to continue to
take all appropriate action necessary to combat these abuses by such
personnel, including through the full implementation without delay of
those measures adopted in the relevant General Assembly resolutions
based upon the recommendations of the report of the Special Committee on
Peacekeeping, A/59/19/Rev.1;
“21. Stresses the importance for all,
within the framework of humanitarian assistance, of upholding and
respecting the humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality,
impartiality and independence;
“22. Urges all those concerned as set
forth in international humanitarian law, including the Geneva
Conventions and The Hague Regulations, to allow full unimpeded access by
humanitarian personnel to civilians in need of assistance in situations
of armed conflict, and to make available, as far as possible, all
necessary facilities for their operations, and to promote the safety,
security and freedom of movement of humanitarian personnel and United
Nations and its associated personnel and their assets;
“23. Condemns all attacks deliberately
targeting United Nations and associated personnel involved in
humanitarian missions, as well as other humanitarian personnel, urges States on whose territory such attacks occur to prosecute or extradite those responsible, and welcomes
in this regard the adoption on 8 December 2005 by the General Assembly
of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Safety of United
Nations and Associated Personnel;
“24. Recognizes the increasingly
valuable role that regional organizations and other intergovernmental
institutions play in the protection of civilians, and encourages
the Secretary-General and the heads of regional and other
intergovernmental organizations to continue their efforts to strengthen
their partnership in this regard;
“25. Reiterates its invitation to the
Secretary-General to continue to refer to the Council relevant
information and analysis regarding the protection of civilians where he
believes that such information or analysis could contribute to the
resolution of issues before it, requests him to continue to include in
his written reports to the Council on matters of which it is seized, as
appropriate, observations relating to the protection of civilians in
armed conflict, and encourages him to continue consultations and take
concrete steps to enhance the capacity of the United Nations in this
regard;
“26. Notes that the deliberate
targeting of civilians and other protected persons, and the commission
of systematic, flagrant and widespread violations of international
humanitarian and human rights law in situations of armed conflict, may
constitute a threat to international peace and security, and, reaffirms in this regard its readiness to consider such situations and, where necessary, to adopt appropriate steps;
“27. Requests the Secretary-General to
submit his next report on the protection of civilians in armed conflict
within 18 months of the date of this resolution;
“28. Decides to remain seized of the matter.”
For information media. Not an official record.
Nguồn: http://www.un.org/press/en/2006/sc8710.doc.htm
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét